Philosophy of Leadership

The target of this investigate is to examine the Philosophy of Leadership. I exit be discussing distinct toll that relate to philosophy of lead, theories and definitions. I will be discussing trans correspondional leadinghip how it relates to philosophy, berthal leaders, and procreative leadership. Leboeuf (1999) he regulated philosophy as the rational investigation of the justness and principals of being acquaintance or conduct(p. 28). Philosophy assumes that leadership rest in individuals who mustiness be capable of inspiring and influencing others to solve problems and achieve goals (Sandmann, 1995).harmonize to Peter (1966) philosophy should involve a particular mode of cerebration directed to the disciplined demarcation of concepts, the patient explication of the grounds of knowledge and of the presuppositions of different forms of discourse (p. 15) The educational institution leader is stolon and formost a teacher. Their first-string duties argon to teach tho se that they lead and through them the students of the institution. Someone must puzzle out the decisions and bear the responsibility to enforce them.There is no point in being a leader, however if no one is willing to copy and to be resultive chest of drawers figures we must have the cooperation of those we lead. It is grand for the leader to understand internalize and consider the perception of the host countrys leaders an the deflect these leaders have in the smooth operation of the institution in conjunction with the local community . It is the responsibility of the leader to understand the complexities of the host community and to communicate to each of its member the attempt to actually figure in resolving issues.Leadership is personal unless you know who you ar, what you atomic number 18 active to do and why then(prenominal) you cant apprehend to achieve anything actually grand. Leaders atomic number 18 judge by how they stand up for their adopt principles a nd values, but most outstandingly by how they live a purport according to these principles and values (Pelonis & Stefanos, 2010). accord to Sergiovanni (1992) Our goal should be to develop a leadership practice found on professional incorrupt authority (p. 29) . The uniqueness of the individual leader must be considerd and one should take cre to adopt strategies and behaviours that fit with the core personality (Pelonis & Stefanos, 2010).Generative leaders recognizes that in that location atomic number 18 multiple ways of knowing and surround themselves with other judgement leaders, including those with whom they disagree. They use holistice, systems perspective in their thinking and move beyond sensed limitations of time,space,traditional thought and their own views of the arena . Generative leaders are homogeneous to transformative leaders in determineing with others to effect intensify, a generative leader however is one whose definition of success includes finding new options and solutions (Disch, 2009).Transformational leadership occurs when leaders broaden and elevate the interests of their employees, when they generate awareness and acceptance of the purpose and mission of the look beyond their own self-centeredness for the good collection. Transformational leaders achieve these results in one or more ways. They may be charismatic to their followers and thus shake them they may collide with the turned on(p) needs of each employee and they may intellectually stimulate employees (Bass 1990). Transfomational leadership communicates a passel that inspires and motivates people to achieve something extraordinary.Transformational leaders similarly have the world power to align people and systems so there is an integrity through-out the organization towords vision (Hughes & Curphy,1994). According to Cacioppe (1997) Transformational leaders have a vision and an king to inspire followers to incoperate higer values. It pulls them towards a chieving an important challenge (p. 336) Context of Problem Academic leadership is necessary now more than ever. Leadership for todays world requires enlarging ones capacity to see the whole board. Leadership is define by the authors as the continuous act of influencing others to accomplish a parkland objective.Academic leadership is further define as the continuous act of influencing all constituents of an academic institution to accomplish its mission and to provide the scoop possible educational experience for students. Leadership is personal unless you know who you are ,what you are prepared to do and why, then you cant hope to achieve anything real grand (Pelonis & Stefanos, 2010). Knowledge is define as the evidence or fact of knowing and it usually refers to knowledge gained by culture and study. With that being said, it is actually important to be knowledgeable about whatever your career of choice is.As an educator ,which I know that it is important to find different ways that one can become knowledgeable about what they do in the work place because most importantly teaching and interacting with others on a daily basis. Take this situation for an example, it is your first year as a teacher and the first semester is finally over. You are not an experienced teacher but you know the overall esprit de corps at your school is low, student achievement is down, and discipline issues are overwhelming. This is unimpeachably not the atmosphere that they talk of the towned about in your teaching classes in college.You hope to go to the administration but in your past meetings, you have not felt comfortable expressing your concerns. The principal talks to the teachers in a very disrespectful manner, does not address teacher issues and concerns, and never leave behinds any verifying feedback at faculty meetings. On top of that administration has visited your room some(prenominal) times and has never given you any feedback about what was seen or how you could reform your teaching. You feel un frequented, overwhelmed, and headed toward a rocky second semester. You need someone to talk to and you begin to think about a upport radical that can give you some knowledge about your profession. You more than likely want a teacher that has been around for a while that knows all the ropes about education. livelihood groups are a great way to grow professionally and fix knowledge. As a teacher, you fulfill a number of roles for your students both intellectually and socially. In addition to training about different teaching techniques, support groups can help you deal with the responsibilities and pressures that come with the profession. I believe that both new educator needs a teachers support group at their school.Taking the sole responsibility for starting a well-planned support group can be time-consuming but also be very rewarding for a teacher who is seeking to spend a penny knowledge in the study. It may also be helpful to invit e colleagues to meet for a general discussion at least once a hebdomad so any questions or concerns can be addressed. As the group evolves, the details concerning agenda and procedures will iron out as you tailor-make the group to fit whatever the knowledge one is seeking within the workplace. As we all know everyone does not know it is very important for an educator to be knowledgeable about what they do.Educator holds some very important lives in our hand and they need knowledge. For instance, if educators fail to make the goals attainable, students will never internalize or truly comprehend the skills and make them work in their own brains. Experts say they should steer clear of teaching children as if they were unfilled vessels for information (Barth, 2001). As an alternative, educator should allow them to construct knowledge in a process-oriented way. Instead of worksheets we should incorporate publishing and technology effectively. Then, your schoolroom will replicate the t echnological powerhouse society in which students live.Finally, unceasingly think about standardized test scores instead of drumhead evaluation statistics and urge parents to do the same. Teachers and teams of teachers must make certified, knowledgeable verdicts based on their individual students requirements and skill levels, in relation to curricular necessities and framework. To do this, teachers must be directed and sustained in an uninterrupted learning progression about successful ways to make students learn. Which brings me to my point, an educator must have knowledge and if they do not have knowledge then there are ways to have knowledge in the workplace as I mentioned before.Goodlad (2004) believe that school teaching and leadership are moral endeavors and that preservice teacher education programs seldom address the needs for moral leadership in democratic school (p. 27). According to Pelonis and Gialamas (2010) Successful leadership in the international academic arena calls for leaders to have the following qualities to be continuous learners, risk takers ,visionaries , performing well under stress and able to promote and accommodate change.The ability to cope with and promote change will in fact determine to a large grad the effectiveness of the leader during transitional times ( p. 73). Successful leaders are sensitive to the situation and their followers, are flrxible,and able to adopt to the use situation to ensure that the vision is achieved. A challenging, worthwhile vision is also character of a good leader. The leaders helps the follower transcend their own self-interest and participate in a vision for greater good (Cacioppe,1997).According to Leboeuf (1999) the first element to consider in developing a philosophy of leadership is vision (p. 29). Nanus (1992) contends that vision must be reverend a mental model of future state of the organization. He also stated that vision must also possess the properties of appropriateness, standard s of excellence, purpose and focusing (Nanus, 1992). Philosophy examins how meaning is determined and knowledge is established through spoken communication usage (Peter, 1966). Leadership philosophy reflects his principals , values,personal , professional goals and talents.It is essential to identify strategies and be st practice for implementing the adopted philosophy. If one adopts the model of leadership in alliance with flexibility, then strategy would require the leader and the leadership team to meet and clearly precisely define the authority and accountability of each (Pelonis & Stefanos, 2010). The report of shared leadership is variously termed dispersed, roving, distributive,collective,or group-centered leadership, and organizations are referred to as leaderful.All of us have leadership qualities that can be pooled and drawn upon as needed. (Nirenburg, 1993) Generativity is the ability to produce or originate , and generative leaders are individuals who create new optio ns or new approachers to old problems and work with and through others to effect needed change, Generative leaders are intellectually curious and never satisfied with the status quo they are resilient and optimistic, seeing opportunties where others see insoluble problems (Disch, 2009).According to Disch (2009) Generative leaders model creativity and innovations,work with others to enhance their capabilities and create environ,environments in which people can do their best work (p. 173). Transformational leaders are individually considerate, that is, they pay close attention to differences among their employees they act as mentors to those who need help to grow and develop. Intellectual stimulation leader are willing and able to show their employees new ways of looking at old problems to be solved, and to emphasize rational solutions. (Bass, 1990)Situational leadership is one of several(prenominal) transaction al approaches to leadership. Other transactional theories like path goal guess and leader-participation theory attains the major line of work of the leaders to guide motivate task of he leader to guide and motivate their followers in the concern of established goals and to reward their efforts in ways that are fair and wanted by followers Situational leadership uses the two dimensions of supportive and directive to describe four leadership styles that are most appriopate depending on the situation and the developmental level of the person or group. The major advace of the situation approach is the acknowledgment that for different development levels and different types of situation, different leadership styles are more effective (Cacioppe ,1997).