National Security Vs. Individual Rights Essay

No form of establishment can survive when the tone of the nation is at stake. Because I agree with Clinton Rossiter, I affirm the colony that When the United States is engaged in troops conflict, the demands of subject shelter ought to supersede conflicting claims of individual rights. Definitions from Encarta World English Dictionary Engaged in Military Conflict means fighting open warf ar. Demands of national security means encourageion against loss, attack, or harm to the citizens. Ought to supersede means that on that point is a duty or obligation to take the place or position of something. Conflicting means not able to be followed or acted on, because each requires different and incompatible actions. Claims of individual rights are demands for entitlements, freedoms, or privileges a person has. Before I begin, I have an observation intimately the proclamation. The demands of national security and claims to individual rights must be viewed as legitimate. Because the r esolution says ought, we are debating about whether or not national security is a justifiable cause to limit rights.I am upholding kind upbeat as my value. Societal welfare is the conditions under which somebody may croak satisfactorily in a community. The criterion upholding my value is the PRESERVATION OF SOCIAL ORDER. The United States has the obligation to its citizens to retain the cabaret by acting on the demands of national security. Contention I Government is created to husband welfare by restricting individual rights. Before political science was created, we live in what prat Locke called the state of nature. In this state of nature, humans were absolutely free. However, we are not able to enjoy these rights because we are not provided galosh. We enter a disposal in order to preserve life, liberty, and property. Locke states Man gives up self-power to be regulated by laws made by the society, so far forth as the rescue of himself, and the rest of that society shal l require which laws of the society in many things stick in the liberty he had by the law of nature. Even when man is in harmony with government, certain individual rights are limited.When in military conflict, however, nicety and security are both compromised, and something must be done to encourage them. Contention II Government must provide for the safety of the society during war by further restricting rights. The highest obligation a government has is to provide the encourageion of its citizens, and certain rights that may be allowed in little vulnerable times may jeopardize national security during military conflict. Because new forces endanger the society, new measures must be taken to preserve societal order. Jean Jacques Rousseau affirms this. Only the greatest dangers can outweigh that of ever-changing the public order, and the sacred power of the laws should never be interfered with except when the safety of the country is at stake. Even certain constitutional rights may be temporarily superceded during these times. Political Science Professor Martin Shaffer explains To meet the challenge of a major emergency, the barriers against omnipotent government established by the constitution must oftentimes be transcended.Contention III Government has the duty to protect its citizens. When the government restricts rights, it does so to provide security to its citizens. Assuming, as we should under this resolution, that national security is at risk, government, by entering this social contract with its people, has the boilersuit obligation to protect societal welfare. It must restrict certain freedoms of expression, privacy, and ascribable process if it will protect the people. Security must come in the first place rights. Abraham Maslows hierarchy of needs places security just above visible needs such as food, water, and shelter. Without security first, rights become invalid and government is unable to function. Men cannot respect a government that does not preserve society. In conclusion, as a legitimate government, the United States has the obligation to protect societal welfare. Because it must protect its citizens above all, temporary infringements on rights are necessary.